Visit Anon-Gump's column >>

ANON-GUMP

Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 0; Links Seeded: 1
Member Since: 5/2008Last Seen: 5/21/2008

When Anonymous attacks

advertisement

The topic Hoffman was addressing in her post happened to be Scientology. From personal experience I know that the subject of Scientology regularly results in angry-off-the point comments that contribute little to productive dialogue. (Note: comments off topic are regularly and [hopefully] hastily deleted from this site.) The challenge of the subject of Scientology is that some people believe they are an evil cult while others, those who believe in Scientology, believe it is all about achieving self-improvement.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
1.5
{"commentId":1822452,"authorDomain":"anongump"}

Here's what Hoffman wrote about a German government official's comments that Scientology is "not compatible with the" German constitution:

What is Germany so afraid of?

German officials have categorized Scientology as a business, not a religion, and tax accordingly. Scientology has responded by complaining about "religious discrimination."

The AP reports that "The North Rhine-Westphalia Higher Administrative Court in Muenster refused last month to hear an appeal to a February ruling allowing the intelligence agencies to continue observing the Scientologists. . . .

Ban Scientology? Doesn't that seem kind of extreme? They are a religion largely focused on self-improvement. While I'm well aware of their checkered past, decrying it unconstitutional seems like a threatened position to take by a nation.

It is unconstitutional because it is a self-help organization, which claims to be a "religion" and is exempt from US taxes. If KBR (Halliburton) did this, you would all be up-in-arms.

{"commentId":1822452,"threadId":"267218","contentId":"1501351","authorDomain":"anongump"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Tue May 20, 2008 2:25 PM EDT
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"267218","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"267218","contentId":"1501351"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking